CASE STUDY
CPHC was contracted by Health & Medicine Policy Research Group (HMPRG) and the Patient-Community Advisory Council of the CAPriCORN Clinical Data Network to facilitate and evaluate a Patient Centered Outcomes Resource Institute (PCORI) a Eugene Washington Engagement Award. This demonstrates the nascent power of a well-resourced patient centric project. The resulting ‘research statement’ is particularly indicative of activated participants because CPHC did not request or seek out this deliverable; given a safe space to share, participants felt empowered to speak up.
FACTS & FIGURES
369
A 15-item survey was created based on local Community Health Needs Assessments.
Number of Community members that took the survey. The questionnaire consisted of 5 demographic items, 4 attitude statements assessed on a 4-point Likert-type items, 2 rank order items, 2 factual items and 6 open-ended questions. Most participants were paid to complete the survey.
96
An interview script was created in a way that allowed for corroboration with the survey.
Number of people that participated in one of 3 Community input sessions facilitated by CPHC facilitators. Participants were entered into a raffle for incentive prizes. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics and axial coding.
4
A ‘member check’ was held with community to ensure that the data analysis was accurate.
Number of community-informed research questions developed as a result of the study, as well as a ‘research statement’ that was indicative of the dominate health conditions and social issues impacting the health of the Community.